Current:Home > NewsJudge rules Michigan lawmakers violated open meetings law during debate on gun control legislation -DataFinance
Judge rules Michigan lawmakers violated open meetings law during debate on gun control legislation
View
Date:2025-04-18 20:35:27
DETROIT (AP) — A judge has ruled that Michigan lawmakers violated the state’s open meetings laws during public hearings on gun control legislation.
Court of Claims Judge Robert Redford ruled Thursday that the House of Representatives violated the Open Meetings Act by limiting testimony during committee hearings on the bills this past spring, the Detroit Free Press reported.
The legislation expands background checks, implements so-called red-flag laws, which allow judges to temporarily confiscate a firearm from an individual, and imposes safe storage requirements on guns in homes where children are present. The laws are set to go into effect Feb. 13, exactly a year after a gunman opened fire at Michigan State University, killing three students and injuring five others.
Committees in both the House and Senate heard mostly from the legislation’s supporters during hearings in March and April. Speakers from Great Lakes Gun Rights and Michigan Open Carry were allowed to submit cards in opposition but were not allowed to speak during a House committee hearing on the red-flag bills. Lawmakers said they were under a time constraint.
The Open Meetings Act requires public bodies to make meetings and actions accessible to the public. Under the act, entities must make time for members of the public who attend meetings to speak, although they can impose time limitations.
Great Lakes Gun Rights and Michigan Open Carry filed a lawsuit in April asking a judge to issue a temporary restraining order against the laws, arguing lawmakers violated the Open Meetings Act by not allowing balanced testimony during committee hearings on the bills.
Redford, the judge, declined to enter an injunction to bring the House into compliance with the act, saying lawmakers can determine the rules of their own proceedings. He said in his decision there was no indication the Senate violated the act.
veryGood! (82)
Related
- All That You Wanted to Know About She’s All That
- Why are Canadian wildfires affecting the U.S.?
- Meadow Walker Honors Late Dad Paul Walker With Fast X Cameo
- Today’s Climate: August 31, 2010
- Highlights from Trump’s interview with Time magazine
- The chase is on: Regulators are slowly cracking down on vapes aimed at teens
- Why vaccine hesitancy persists in China — and what they're doing about it
- How some therapists are helping patients heal by tackling structural racism
- Federal Spending Freeze Could Have Widespread Impact on Environment, Emergency Management
- Georgia's highest court reinstates ban on abortions after 6 weeks
Ranking
- Which apps offer encrypted messaging? How to switch and what to know after feds’ warning
- Pipeline Expansion Threatens U.S. Climate Goals, Study Says
- Elliot Page Shares Shirtless Selfie While Reflecting on Dysphoria Journey
- A Triple Serving Of Flu, COVID And RSV Hits Hospitals Ahead Of Thanksgiving
- IRS recovers $4.7 billion in back taxes and braces for cuts with Trump and GOP in power
- A Triple Serving Of Flu, COVID And RSV Hits Hospitals Ahead Of Thanksgiving
- Heat Wave Safety: 130 Groups Call for Protections for Farm, Construction Workers
- Factory workers across the U.S. say they were exposed to asbestos on the job
Recommendation
Global Warming Set the Stage for Los Angeles Fires
Fossil Fuel Money Still a Dry Well for Trump Campaign
Increased Asthma Attacks Tied to Exposure to Natural Gas Production
Beijing adds new COVID quarantine centers, sparking panic buying
Small twin
Don't Let These 60% Off Good American Deals Sell Out Before You Can Add Them to Your Cart
Hillary Clinton’s Choice of Kaine as VP Tilts Ticket Toward Political Center
Too Hot to Handle's Francesca Farago Shares Plans to Freeze Eggs After Jesse Sullivan Engagement